Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 33
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy