Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 33
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy