Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +1853%
12.19 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 33
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy