Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 213% (2440MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +3906%
19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy