Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +312%
19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy