Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 32
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy