Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (190W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +300%
31.95 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
48
Compute Units
64
3072
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy