Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2600MHz vs 1440MHz)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +209%
31.95 TFLOPS
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
48
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
3584
192
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 32
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy