Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +203%
44.78 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
8192
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy