Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +127842%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

70
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4480
Shading Units
16
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
34W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G96
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy