Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +62094%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

70
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
4480
Shading Units
32
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G96C
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy