Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +4256%
44.78 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

70
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4480
Shading Units
448
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
900W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF100
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy