Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (295W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +343%
61.32 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
7680
384
TMUs
240
192
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy