Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 32GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 204.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +1739%
61.32 TFLOPS
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
3.333 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Feb 2023
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
1792
384
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
56
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.666 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.667 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GA10B
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

295W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy