Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +12517%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Nov 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
256
384
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
32
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

295W
TDP
142W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF100
Navi 31
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy