Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +7080%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
640
384
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
16
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

295W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GM107
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy