Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +211348%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Oct 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
16
384
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G86
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
21W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy