Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +5864%
61.32 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
6144
Shading Units
448
384
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
48
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

295W
TDP
247W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF110
Navi 31
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy