Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +158%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Tahiti
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy