Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +2673%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT218
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy