Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +271%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 OEM
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.500 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GK107
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy