Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1219MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +68%
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GK106
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy