Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 83W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2005
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
NV41
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Curie
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
83W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy