Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
ATI Radeon HD 4810 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +56%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4810
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
160.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV770
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 CE (215-0669093)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy