Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5690

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 64W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +101%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5690
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
64W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Redwood
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Redwood XT (215-0757002)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy