Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5830 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)
ATI Radeon HD 5830 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5830 +43%
1.792 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1120
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cypress
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress LE (215-0735047)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy