Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +563%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
512
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT215
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy