AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (2200MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620
+1525%
20.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
Navi 21
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT
(215-121000177)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
