Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 115W)
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X +57%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
115W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Bonaire
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy