Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1410MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +912%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
4480
32
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GA100
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy