CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 135W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+200%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
G92
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
135W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
2
AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
5
ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
6
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
7
AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro V7800
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy