CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+85%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
VS
GeForce GTX 275
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GT200B
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
2
AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
5
ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
6
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
7
AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy