Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 236W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +100%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT200
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
236W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy