Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +163%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Tonga
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy