Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M5950

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +98%
1.385 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Whistler
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy