Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +621%
1.385 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
G94
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy