CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
+621%
1.385 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
VS
GeForce GTS 160M
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Polaris 23
GPU Name
G94
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
5
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 555
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8750A
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8670A
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M440
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy