CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL 's Advantages
Boost Clock1011MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega M GL
+86%
2.588 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Vega
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
931 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
20
640
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.35 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.88 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.588 TFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.588 TFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
161.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Polaris 23
GPU Name
Polaris 22
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
VegaM XL (D715A714)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 6970M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
3
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7770M
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M
7
AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy