Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +248%
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
R600
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy