Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FireGL V3600

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
520 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +1051%
1.658 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV630
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy