Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +14%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy