Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +38%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV770
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy