Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1550MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +3%
2.46 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2016
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1125 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
2.460 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
153.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
DG1
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy