Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +13337%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cedar
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy