Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +479%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cayman
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy