CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200
+3099%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200
VS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
112
224
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
G92
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
230W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
3
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP
5
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD FirePro S9000
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD FirePro W4100
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770 Green Edition
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy