Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1703%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy