Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +10650%
10.75 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GF119
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy