Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +22295%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV620
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy