Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1399%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy