CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 235 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 235 OEM
0.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
+35%
0.336 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 235 OEM
VS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
2
Compute Units
-
160
Shading Units
112
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
6.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
248.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Caicos
GPU Name
G92
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
35W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240
6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
8
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
9
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
10
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy